4.6 Article

CO2-laser for the genitourinary syndrome of menopause. How many laser sessions?

期刊

MATURITAS
卷 104, 期 -, 页码 24-28

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2017.07.007

关键词

Genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM); Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI); Menopause; Vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA); Atrophy; Sexual dysfunction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: The aim of this prospective study was to assess the efficacy of 3, 4 or 5 CO2-laser sessions for the management of the genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM). Methods: Postmenopausal women with moderate to severe symptoms of dyspareunia, wanting to resume/retain sexual activity, were treated with 3-5 laser sessions depending on symptom severity/presence, sexual function, clinical findings and women's preference following the third laser application. Main outcomes: Severity of dyspareunia, dryness, sexual function, sexual satisfaction and frequency of sexual intercourse defined the primary outcomes. Vaginal Maturation Value (VMV) and Vaginal Health Index Score (VHIS) defined the secondary ones. Results: Fifty-five women received three sessions, 53 an extra fourth and 22 an extra fifth. Following the third, fourth and fifth laser sessions, respectively: dyspareunia completely regressed in 15/55 (27%), 32/55 (58%) and 38/47 (81%) of participants; dryness completely regressed in 20/55 (36%), 36/55 (66%) and 44/51 (86%); normal sexual function resumed in 23/55 (41%), 37/54 (69%) and 41/49 (84%); VMV regained non-atrophic values in 29/55 (53%), 38/55 (69%) and 42/50 (84%); and VHIS regained non -atrophic values in 44/55 (80%), 53/55 (96%) and 55/55 (100%) of participants. Conclusion: Results of this study indicate that CO2-laser therapy may contribute to complete regression of dyspareunia and dryness and reestablishment of normal sexual function in postmenopausal women, in a dose response manner. An extra fourth or fifth session may further increase the GSM symptom-free rate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据