4.6 Article

Oxygen surface exchange and diffusion in Pr1.75Sr0.25Ni0.75Co0.25O4±δ

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 21, 期 9, 页码 4779-4790

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9cp00172g

关键词

-

资金

  1. Act 211 of the Government of the Russian Federation [02.A03.21.0006]
  2. [M(sic)-6758.2018.3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oxygen surface exchange and diffusion in Pr1.75Sr0.25Ni0.75Co0.25O4 +/- have been investigated using two methods: pulsed isotope exchange (PIE) and oxygen isotope exchange with gas phase equilibration (IE GPE). Oxygen surface exchange kinetics is considered in the framework of two-step models including two consecutive stages: dissociative adsorption of oxygen and incorporation of oxygen adatoms into the crystal lattice. The rates of oxygen heterogeneous exchange (r(H)) as well as the rates of dissociative adsorption (r(a)) and oxygen incorporation (r(i)) have been calculated. The applicability of the two-step model is discussed based on the concept of a novel two-step mechanism with distributed rates of dissociative adsorption and incorporation of oxygen. It is shown that the two-step model can be applicable for the description of oxygen exchange kinetics in Pr1.75Sr0.25Ni0.75Co0.25O4 +/- only at temperatures below 750 degrees C. Above this temperature, only the statistical model with distributed rates can be used. At low temperatures (<750 degrees C), the oxygen incorporation rate is found to be smaller than the rate of oxygen dissociative adsorption. Thus, under these experimental conditions the stage of oxygen incorporation is considered to be rate-determining. When increasing the temperature, the difference between r(a) and r(i) decreases and the stages become competing. The oxygen isotope exchange kinetic profiles obtained using the IE GPE method are found to be complicated and include a surface exchange stage as well as at least two diffusion relaxation processes. The reasons for the existence of these two processes are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据