4.5 Article

Impact of dissolved organic matter on mercury and methylmercury sorption to activated carbon in soils: implications for remediation

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-PROCESSES & IMPACTS
卷 21, 期 3, 页码 485-496

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8em00469b

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIEHS [5R01ES024284]
  2. Dow Chemical Company
  3. Smithsonian Institution

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Activated carbon (AC) amendments have shown promise in reducing inorganic mercury (Hg(II) complexes, Hg) and methylmercury (MeHg) risk in contaminated soils. However, the effectiveness of AC in Hg and MeHg immobilization has varied among studies, suggesting that site biogeochemistry might dictate efficacy. In this study, we examined the effect of dissolved organic matter (DOM) on MeHg and Hg sorption to AC. We evaluated the impact of Suwannee River Humic Acid (SRHA) on sorption to AC directly using an isotherm approach and in a soil/AC mixture using slurry microcosms. Aqueous sorption coefficients to AC (log K-AC) for Hg-SRHA and MeHg-SRHA complexes were one to two orders of magnitude lower (Hg-SRHA = 4.53, MeHgSRHA = 4.35) than those for chloride complexes (HgCl2 = 6.55, MeHgCl = 4.90) and more closely resembled the log K-AC of SRHA (3.64). In anoxic, sulfidic soil slurries, the K-AC for sulfide species appeared stronger than for chloride or SRHA species for both Hg and MeHg. AC significantly reduced porewater concentrations of both ambient MeHg and a fresh (MeHg)-Hg-199 spike, and the addition of up to 60 mg L-1 SRHA did not reduce sorption to AC. The AC also reduced ambient Hg and Hg-201 porewater concentrations, but as SRHA concentration increased, the magnitude of solid phase sorption decreased. Speciation modeling revealed that SRHA may have impacted Hg distribution to the solid phase by reducing HgS precipitation. This study highlights the need for site-specific evaluation of AC efficacy and the value in developing biogeochemical models of AC performance for Hg control.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据