4.0 Article

As(V) rejection by NF membranes using high temperature sources for drinking water production

期刊

GROUNDWATER FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 198-204

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gsd.2018.11.011

关键词

Arsenic; Drinking water; Geothermal sources; Nanofiltration; Nicaragua; Temperature

资金

  1. Nuffic through the Netherlands Fellowship Programmes [NFP-PhD.14/126]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In Nicaragua, a Central American country, geothermally influenced waters are frequently found to be contaminated with arsenic (as As(V)). This study investigated the effect of high-temperatures (25-50 degrees C), as found in geothermally influenced source waters, on the rejection of monovalent H2AsO4- and divalent HAsO42- species (at pH 6,7 and 8) during NF membrane filtration of a multi-component solution containing Cl- and HCO3-. In this multi-component solution, As(V) rejection was found to be enhanced at higher temperatures, which was in contrast to the previous assumption that temperature increase would have a negative effect on As(V) rejection. Previous studies were conducted with deionized waters, where pore size expansion and decreased viscosity drove As(V) rejection; however, in the presence of other anions such as those utilized in this study, As(V) rejection was promoted at higher temperatures. The enhancement of As(V) rejection at high temperature was associated with the presence of HCO3- and Cl-, which are considerably more permeable than both As(V) species. An additional advantage of the higher temperature was the lower feed pressure (down to 1.5 bar) needed to operate these NF membranes, compared to colder waters. The lower energy consumption in combination with the improvement in As(V) rejection at higher temperatures shows the potential application of this technology for efficient treatment of As(V) contaminated, geothermally influenced waters for decentralised, rural drinking water production, in As-affected countries such Nicaragua.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据