4.6 Article

Monocular Camera Based Fruit Counting and Mapping With Semantic Data Association

期刊

IEEE ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION LETTERS
卷 4, 期 3, 页码 2296-2303

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LRA.2019.2901987

关键词

Robotics in agriculture and forestry; deep learning in robotics and automation; visual tracking; mapping; object detection; segmentation and categorization

类别

资金

  1. Army Research Laboratory, Distributed and Collaborative Intelligent Systems and Technology Collaborative Research Alliance [W911NF-17-2-0181]
  2. Army Research Office [W911NF-13-1-0350]
  3. United States Department of Agriculture [2015-67021-23857]
  4. National Science Foundation [IIS-1138847]
  5. Qualcomm Research
  6. C-BRIC
  7. DARPA
  8. Australian Centre for Field Robotics, The University of Sydney
  9. NIFA [2015-67021-23857, 810574] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this letter, we present a cheap, lightweight, and fast fruit counting pipeline. Our pipeline relies only on a monocular camera, and achieves counting performance comparable to a state-of-the-art fruit counting system that utilizes an expensive sensor suite including a monocular camera, LiDAR and GPS/INS on amango dataset. Our pipeline begins with a fruit and tree trunk detection component that uses state-of-the-art convolutional neural networks (CNNs). It then tracks fruits and tree trunks across images, with a Kalman Filter fusing measurements from the CNN detectors and an optical flow estimator. Finally, fruit count and map are estimated by an efficient fruit-as-feature semantic structure from motion algorithm that converts two-dimensional (2-D) tracks of fruits and trunks into 3-D landmarks, and uses these landmarks to identify double counting scenarios. There are many benefits of developing such a low cost and lightweight fruit counting system, including applicability to agriculture in developing countries, where monetary constraints or unstructured environments necessitate cheaper hardware solutions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据