4.4 Article

The buffering effect of social support on the relationship between discrimination and psychological distress among church-going African-American adults

期刊

BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY
卷 115, 期 -, 页码 121-128

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2018.10.008

关键词

Psychological distress; Social support; Discrimination; African Americans; Resilience

资金

  1. University of Houston
  2. University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
  3. National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health through The University of Texas MD Anderson's Cancer Center Support Grant [CA016672]
  4. Duncan Family Institute through the Center for Community-Engaged Translational Research
  5. National Institute on Drug Abuse [R01 DA034739]
  6. National Cancer Institute [P20 CA221697, P20 CA221696]
  7. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism [K99 AA025394]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Discrimination is a pervasive stressor among African-American adults. Social support is an important protective factor for psychological distress, especially among minority populations. Although a number of studies have examined social support in relation to discrimination, little research has examined how social support may serve as an important protective factor against both physical and psychological symptoms related to overall psycho. logical distress within this group. The current study examined social support as a moderator of the relationship between discrimination and overall psychological distress as measured by the Brief Symptom Inventory among a community sample of 122 African-American church-going adults. Results indicated that social support buffered the associations of discrimination and overall psychological distress (p < 0.0001) in expected directions. Findings highlight the importance of cultivating strong social relationships to attenuate the effects of this social determinant on mental health disparities among this group.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据