4.8 Review

Perovskite precursor solution chemistry: from fundamentals to photovoltaic applications

期刊

CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS
卷 48, 期 7, 页码 2011-2038

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8cs00656c

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant from the Korean government (MSIT) [2018R1A3B1052820, 2011-0031565, 2015M1A2A2056542]
  2. brand-project of UNIST [1.180043.01]
  3. NRF Research Fellowship - Ministry of Education [NRF-2016R1A6A3A11930303]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Over the last several years, inorganic-organic hybrid perovskites have shown dramatic achievements in photovoltaic performance and device stability. Despite the significant progress in photovoltaic application, an in-depth understanding of the fundamentals of precursor solution chemistry is still lacking. In this review, the fundamental background knowledge of nucleation and crystal growth processes in solution including the LaMer model and Ostwald ripening process is described. This review article also highlights the recent progress in precursor-coordinating molecule interaction in solution along with the role of anti-solvent in the solvent engineering process to control nucleation and crystal growth. Moreover, chemical pathways from precursor solution to perovskite film formation are given. This represents identification of the intermediate phase induced by precursor-coordinating molecule interaction and responsible intermediate species for uniform and dense perovskite film formation. Further to the description of chemical phenomena in solution, the contemporary progress in chemical precursor composition is also provided to comprehend the current research approaches to further enhance photovoltaic performance and device stability. On the basis of the critical and comprehensive review, we provide some perspectives to further achieve high-performance perovskite solar cells with long-term device stability through precisely controlled nucleation and crystal growth in precursor solution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据