4.6 Article

Effect of the electronic state of Ti on M-doped TiO2 nanoparticles (M=Zn, Ga or Ge) with high photocatalytic activities: A experimental and DFT molecular study

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mssp.2016.10.050

关键词

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy; 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid; Doping (Ga, Ge, Zn); TiO2; Density Functional Theory; Quantum mechanics

资金

  1. PRODEP [DSA/103.5/15/7495, IDCA 23898]
  2. TecMEX [5833.16-P]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the pursuit of environmental sustainability, nanomaterials with specific characteristics that can improve the environment by various methods have been developed. In this work, M-doped TiO2 microspheres have been synthesized by a colloidal route and doped with 1% in wt. of M (M=Zn, Ga and Ge). The materials were calcined at 400 degrees C and they were characterized by means X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, UV-vis spectroscopy coupled with diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS), N-2 physisorption, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The catalytic activity of the materials was studied by evaluating the photocatalytic degradation of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid in an aqueous solution. Moreover the photocatalytic activity of the doped materials were enhanced compared to pristine material, according the next trend: Ge:TiO2 > Ga:TiO2 > Zn:TiO2 > TiO2. The presence of atoms of Zn, Ga or Ge in the structure of TiO2 was shown by XPS analysis, indeed these results reveal a diminution of the energy levels of the 2p(3/2) and 2p(1/2) electrons from doped materials compared with pristine material, which is evidence for a strong relationship between the doped cation valence of the TiO2 and the degradation of the 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid. Theoretical calculations within DFT framework were performed on two models of nanoparticles like-anatase in order to interpret the photocatalytic activity obtained experimentally by means the frontier orbitals (HOMO and LUMO), the morphology and electronic distribution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据