4.7 Article

Comparative study on microstructure and mechanical properties of a C-Mn-Si steel treated by quenching and partitioning (Q & P) processes after a full and intercritical austenitization

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2016.12.026

关键词

Q & P process; Retained austenite; Product of strength and elongation; Mechanical stability; TRIP effect

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51034009, 51374069, 51504062]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [N130618001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A C-Mn-Si steel with lean microalloy elements was treated by a series of quenching and partitioning (Q & P) processes after a full or intercritical austenitization (hereinafter referred as F-QP and I-QP process, respectively). The discrepancy in microstructure and mechanical properties of the samples under these two heat treatment processes was investigated. The results indicate that the austenite grains are mainly film-like in the F-QP samples, while blocky austenite grains account for the majority in the I-QP samples. And the later contains a larger amount of retained austenite than the former. In addition, the reason why the austenite fraction decreases with the increasing of partitioning time after the peak value can be related to the bainite transformation due to the dynamic change of phase region in the continue cooling transformation (CCT) diagram of untransformed austenite with carbon enrichment. The I-QP samples show higher product of strength and elongation (PSE) but relatively lower strength, while the F-QP samples are just the reverse. Notably, the one-step I-QP samples show an excellent strength ductility balance, of which the tensile strength and total elongation are 1140-1280 MPa and 17-22%, respectively. The exponential function and Olson-Cohen (O-C) model were utilized to fit the variation of retained austenite fraction with strain. By comparison, retained austenite in the I-QP sample is more sensitive to the increasing strain, i.e., lower mechanical stability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据