4.7 Article

Microstructure and properties of a CoCrFeNiMn high-entropy alloy processed by equal-channel angular pressing

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2017.08.083

关键词

CoCrFeNiMn; High-entropy alloy; Equal-channel angular pressing; Post-deformation annealing; Severe plastic deformation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51531001]
  2. NRF Korea - MoE [NRF-2016R1A6A1A03013422]
  3. MSIP [NRF-2016K1A4A3914691]
  4. European Research Council [267464-SPDMETALS]
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [2016K1A4A3914691] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A CoCrFeNiMn high-entropy alloy (HEA) was processed by equal-channel angular pressing (ECAP) for up to four passes at 673 K and the results show that the strength increases gradually with increasing straining up to similar to 1 GPa with an elongation to failure of similar to 35% after four passes of ECAP. In this condition, the microstructure is a single-phase ultrafine-grained (UFG) CoCrFeNiMn HEA with an average grain size of 100 nm and a high dislocation density. This UFG HEA was subjected to post-deformation annealing (PDA) at temperatures of 673-1073 K for 60 min and it is shown that the hardness increases slightly due to precipitation to 773 K and then decreases to 1073 K due to a combination of recrystallization, grain growth and a dissolution of precipitates. The formation of brittle sigma-phase precipitates improves the strength significantly but with a minor decrease in ductility. Annealing at the peak temperature of 773 K produces a very high yield strength of similar to 1015 MPa and an ultimate strength of similar to 1080 MPa together with an excellent elongation to failure of similar to 30%. An analysis of the data shows that grain boundary strengthening is the most important strengthening mechanism in these ECAP samples both before and after PDA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据