4.7 Article

Investigation by mechanical spectroscopy at different frequencies of the nucleation processes in amorphous Cu-Zr-Al alloys

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2017.04.004

关键词

Bulk metallic glasses; Amorphous metals; Mechanical spectroscopy; Internal friction; Cu-Zr-Al

资金

  1. Brazilians agency Sao Paulo Research Foundations (FAPESP) [2013/13378 - 1, 2013/05987 - 8, 2012/08457 - 7]
  2. Brazilians agency Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES)
  3. Brazilians agency National Council of Technological and Scientific Development (CNPq)
  4. Uruguay funding agency PEDECIBA (Program for the Development of Basic Science)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The anelastic spectra of Cu39.5Zr51Al9.5, Cu54Zr40Al6 and Cu-47.75Zr47.75Al4.5 bulk metallic glasses were obtained by Mechanical Spectroscopy Technique at different frequencies. Studies below room temperature show two principal mechanisms: one broad peak, similar to beta relaxation, and another sharp peak, similar to alpha relaxation. This observation suggests that the interaction between amorphous structure and mechanical waves demonstrates that beta' relaxation can be decomposed in two principal peaks, one due to the movement of flow units and another owing to the growth of molecular-like structures. The behaviour of hybridization among Al-Cu atoms tends to decrease the free space in the amorphous matrix, increasing internal friction. The mechanical excitation and interaction among nanostructures such as cluster type, supercluster and molecular-like structure, can lead to growth of microalloy which may give rise to the medium-range order structure as well as increasing the small nanocrystalline region scattered into the glassy structure. In addition, the effect of mechanical vibration and cryogenic temperature acting on the amorphous structure can promote interaction among nanostructures resulting in a barrier that tends to block the propagation of shear bands in the metallic glasses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据