4.5 Article

Environmental tastes, opinions and behaviors: social sciences in the service of cultural ecosystem service assessment

期刊

ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY
卷 20, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

RESILIENCE ALLIANCE
DOI: 10.5751/ES-07545-200328

关键词

cultural ecosystem services; environmental attitudes and behaviors; environmental tastes; hyperarid ecosystems; socio-ecology

资金

  1. Israel Ministry of Regional Cooperation
  2. Arava Science Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cultural ecosystem services are the nonmaterial ways in which humans derive benefits from ecosystems. They are distinct from other types of ecosystem services in that they are not only intangible, but they require an entirely different set of research tools to identify, characterize, and value them. We offer a novel way to assess how individuals perceive and use their local ecosystem, thereby advancing the state-of-the-art of cultural ecosystem service assessment. We identify distinct environmental tastes that represent general dispositions, preferences, or orientations regarding particular characteristics of the environment. We then use these environmental tastes to explain environmental behaviors (e.g., engagement in outdoor activities and resource conservation efforts) and opinions (e.g., perceived economic dependence on various environmental resources and opinions regarding environmentally focused development issues). We identify three distinct environmental tastes: Landscape is associated with the visual and sensory landscape; Biota is associated with living elements of the environment; and Desert is associated with the extreme climatic characteristics of the environment. We report that the Biota environmental taste has wide-ranging impact on subsequent measures of pro-environmental behaviors and opinions. We maintain that this taste dimension is important for the ability of researchers, land use managers, and policy-makers to understand and evaluate cultural ecosystem services and to characterize how humans perceive them and benefit from them.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据