4.3 Article

Development of a DNA-liposome complex for gene delivery applications

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2017.02.012

关键词

Cationic liposome; DNA; Transfection; Gene delivery

资金

  1. NSF [EEC-1160483, ECCS-1351533, CMMI-1363485]
  2. Delta Dental
  3. AFOSR [FA9550-12-1-0225]
  4. Marquette Innovation Fund
  5. Directorate For Engineering
  6. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [1522513] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Div Of Electrical, Commun & Cyber Sys
  8. Directorate For Engineering [1515005] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The association structures formed by cationic liposomes and DNA (Deoxyribonucleic acid)-liposome have been effectively utilized as gene carriers in transfection assays. In this research study, cationic liposomes were prepared using a modified lipid film hydration method consisting of a lyophilization step for gene delivery applications. The obtained results demonstrated that the mean particle size had no significant change while the polydispersity (PDI) increased after lyophilization. The mean particle size slightly reduced after lyophilization (520 +/- 12 nm to 464 +/- 25 nm) while the PDI increased after lyophilization (0.094 +/- 0.017 to 0220 +/- 0.004). In addition. The mean particle size of vesicles increases when DNA is incorporated to the liposomes (673 27 nm). According to the Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images, the spherical shape of liposomes confirmed their successful preservation and reconstitution from the powder. It was found that liposomal formulation has enhanced transfection considerably compared to the naked DNA as negative control. Finally, liposomal formulation in this research had a better function than Lipofectamine 2000 as a commercialized product because the cellular activity (cellular protein) was higher in the prepared lipoplex than Lipofectamine (R) 2000. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据