4.3 Article

Milling properties of low temperature sintered zirconia blocks for dental use

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.12.089

关键词

Milling properties; Y-TZP; CNC; CAD/CAM

资金

  1. Ministry of Economic Affairs, Taiwan, Republic of China [102-EC-17-A-08-S1-142]
  2. Kaohsiung Medical University [KMUH103-3T12]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To investigate the milling properties of different yttria-tetragonal zirconia polycrystalline (Y-TZP) block materials by applying a dental computer numerical control (CNC) milling center. Low temperature sintering zirconia block denoted by KMUZ (experimental) with two commercial zirconia blocks for T block made in Taiwan and a G block made in Germany were compared for the milling properties. Seventy-two specimens were milled using the same CNC milling center, and properties were evaluated by measuring the weight loss (g), milling time (s), margin integrity (%) and broken diameter (pm). The crystalline phases contents were identified by X-ray diffraction and the microstructures of the sintering specimens were observed by scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy. The mean milling time of G and KMUZ were significantly shorter than T (P < 0.05). The KMUZ samples exhibited the least weight loss among the three kinds of blocks (P < 0.05). The percentages of marginal integrity after milling were high in G and KMUZ but low in T (P < 0.05). The mean broken diameters were from 90 pm to 120 pm. The phase transformation of t-ZrO2 (KMUZ: 7.4%, G: 5.9%, T: 3.2%) to m-ZrO2 when facing the milling pressure in ZrO2 blocks was observed by XRD. The result of TEM microstructure of KMUZ revealed that Y and Si were soluble in grain boundaries. The results show that the milling properties of KMUZ were better than one commercial T and near the G. The hindered grain growth, as a result of the Y3+ content in the grain boundaries, also plays a role in promoting the abnormal grain growth of 3Y-TZP. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据