4.3 Article

Sequel of MgO nanoparticles in PLACL nanofibers for anti-cancer therapy in synergy with curcumin/β-cyclodextrin

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.10.050

关键词

Magnesium oxide; Nanoparticles; Nanofibers; Curcumin; beta-Cyclodextrin; Cancer therapy

资金

  1. National Research Foundation Singapore, Campus for Research Excellence and Technological Enterprise (CREATE) programme, Department of Mechanical Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore [WBS R-265-000-554-592]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pharmaceutical industries spend more money in developing new and efficient methods for delivering successful drugs for anticancer therapy. Electrospun nanofibers and nanoparticles loaded with drugs have versatile.biomedical applications ranging from wound healing to anticancer therapy. We aimed to attempt for fabricating elastomeric poly (L-lactic acid-co-epsilon-caprolactone) (PLACL) with Aloe Vera (AV), magnesium oxide (MgO) nanoparticles, curcumin (CUR) and beta-cyclodextrin (beta-CD) composite nanofibers to control the growth of MCF7 cells for breast cancer therapy. The study focused on the interaction of MgO nanoparticle with CUR and (beta-CD inhibiting the proliferation of Michigan Cancer Foundation-7 (MCF-7) breast cancer cells. FESEM micrographs of fabricated electrospun PLACL, PLACL/AV, PLACL/AV/MgO, PLACL/AV/MgQ/CUR and PLACL/AV/MgO/beta-CD nanofibrous scaffolds achieved bead free, random and uniform nanofibers with fiber diameter in the range of 786 +/- 286, 507 +/- 171, 334 +/- 95, 360 +/- 94 and 326 +/- 80 nm respectively. Proliferation of MCF-7 cells was decreased by 65.92%in PLACL/AV/MgO/CUR with respect to PLACL/AV/MgO panolibrous scaffolds on day 9. The obtained results proved that 1% CUR interacting with MgQ nanoparticles showed higher inhibition of MCF-7 cells among all other nanofibrous scaffolds thus serving as 4 promising biocomposite material system for the breast cancer therapy. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据