4.7 Article

High Thermoelectric Performance in Mg2(Si0.3Sn0.7) by Enhanced Phonon Scattering

期刊

ACS APPLIED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 2, 期 3, 页码 2129-+

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.8b02148

关键词

thermoelectrics; magnesium silicides; phonon scattering; figure of merit; thermal conductivity; Mg2X; thermoelectric efficiency

资金

  1. IITB [14IRCCSG020, 14IRTAPSG007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Owing to the high thermoelectric (TE) conversion efficiency, low cost, and environmental friendliness Mg2Si0.3Sn0.7 solid solution has emerged as the material of choice for the n-leg of a TE generator for mid temperature (room temperature to 800 K) applications. Dimensionless TE figure-of-merit (ZT) values of 1.3 (at 700 K) have been reported in this compound when optimally doped. High ZT values in this compound are due to a combination of improved electrical properties (band convergence effect) and reduced lattice thermal conductivity (alloy scattering of phonons). Here we demonstrate that the TE performance in this solid solution can be improved further (ZT(max) = 1.7 at T = 673 K, which is a record in silicide-based TE materials) by enhancing phonon scattering with embedded nanoprecipitates. The high ZT values are obtained when Mg2Si0.3Sn0.7 is codoped with Bi and Cr. While Bi helps in optimizing the electrical transport properties, Cr results in formation of nanoprecipitates. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) studies indicate embedded nanoprecipitates rich in elemental Cr and Sn. The nanoprecipitates also result in a strained interface as confirmed from high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) and grazing incidence XRD (GIXRD) studies. This results in an similar to 15% reduction in the lattice thermal conductivity (kappa(L)) compared to the only Bi-doped sample while retaining similar power factor (S-2 sigma) values. The overall effect is a ZT(eng) value of 0.73, which corresponds to a conversion efficiency (eta) of 12% with the cold side temperature of 323 K and a Delta T = 350 K.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据