4.6 Article

Towards a metier-based assessment and management approach for mixed fisheries in Southeastern Mexico

期刊

MARINE POLICY
卷 103, 期 -, 页码 148-159

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2019.02.040

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Council of Science and Technology Mexico (CONACyT) [172808]
  2. CONACyT [21996]
  3. [252215-CONACyT-Ciencia-Basica]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the Southeastern region of Mexico, fisheries are complex encompassing several fleets that target multiple species with the use of multiple gears. Despite this complexity, they have traditionally been assessed and managed using a single-species approach. Here it is contended that disentangling fishing operations of mixed fisheries (MF) could improve knowledge, that can help generate sound advice for the management of these fisheries. The aim of this paper was to understand the dynamics of fishing operations of the MF that involves participation of three fleets throughout the use of the metier's approach. It was assumed here that differences in catch composition among fleets exist, despite they have access to the same resources, and it will be reflected in the metiers. By segmenting the fleet and disentangling the fishers' operations, discrete units can be identified and analyzed, improving understanding of these fisheries. Segmentation of the fleet resulted in 16 metiers, which showed differences in catch rates, quasi-rent rates, and species composition. To analyze differences, linear mixed models and a dissimilarity-based test for homogeneity of multivariate dispersions analysis were undertaken. Three performance groups of metiers were observed: a) metiers oriented towards low diversity of species focusing mainly on high-value species and involving low trip costs; b) metiers comprising few valuable species but high diversity in species composition; and c) a combination of both types. Based on the results, a management framework that accounts for the identified segments is proposed and adaptations in the assessment and management of these fisheries are advised.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据