4.7 Article

Sex-based differences in the adaptive value of social behavior contrasted against morphology and environment

期刊

ECOLOGY
卷 96, 期 3, 页码 631-641

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1890/14-1320.1

关键词

behavioral plasticity; bighorn sheep; centrality; fission-fusion animal societies; fitness; lamb production; Ovis canadensis; population dynamics; Ram Mountain Alberta; Canada; sex-based differences; sociality; survival

类别

资金

  1. Alberta Department of Fish and Wildlife
  2. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  3. Alberta Conservation Association
  4. Canada Research Chair in Evolutionary Demography and Conservation
  5. Jon Jorgenson

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The adaptive nature of sociality has long been a central question in ecology and evolution. However, the relative importance of social behavior for fitness, compared to morphology and environment, remains largely unknown. We assessed the importance of sociality for fitness (lamb production and survival) in a population of marked bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis) over 16 years (n = 1022 sheep-years). We constructed social networks from observations (n = 38350) of group membership (n = 3150 groups). We then tested whether consistent individual differences in social behavior (centrality) exist and evaluated their relative importance compared to factors known to affect fitness: mass, age, parental effects, and population density. Sheep exhibited consistent individual differences in social centrality. Controlling for maternal carryover effects and age, the positive effect of centrality in a social network on adult female lamb production and survival was equal or greater than the effect of body mass or population density. Social centrality had less effect on male survival and no effect on adult male lamb production or lamb survival. Through its effect on lamb production and survival, sociality in fission-fusion animal societies may ultimately influence population dynamics equally or more than morphological or environmental effects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据