4.6 Article

Effect of hypoxia on BOLD fMRI response and total cerebral blood flow in migraine with aura patients

期刊

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0271678X17719430

关键词

Blood oxygenation level-dependent contrast; cerebral blood flow; functional MRI; hemodynamics; migraine

资金

  1. Capital Region of Denmark Foundation for Health Research [A4620]
  2. Lundbeck Foundation [R155-2014-171]
  3. Novo Nordic Foundation [NNF11OC1014333]
  4. Augustinus Foundation [13-3794]
  5. Det Frie Forskningsrad [DFF-4004-00169B]
  6. Simon Fougner Hartmanns Familiefond
  7. European Union [602633]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Experimentally induced hypoxia triggers migraine and aura attacks in patients suffering from migraine with aura (MA). We investigated the blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) signal response to visual stimulation during hypoxia in MA patients and healthy volunteers. In a randomized double-blind crossover study design, 15 MA patients were allocated to 180 min of normobaric poikilocapnic hypoxia (capillary oxygen saturation 70-75%) or sham (normoxia) on two separate days and 14 healthy volunteers were exposed to hypoxia. The BOLD functional MRI (fMRI) signal response to visual stimulation was measured in the visual cortex ROIs V1-V5. Total cerebral blood flow (CBF) was calculated by measuring the blood velocity in the internal carotid arteries and the basilar artery using phase-contrast mapping (PCM) MRI. Hypoxia induced a greater decrease in BOLD response to visual stimulation in V1-V4 in MA patients compared to controls. There was no group difference in hypoxia-induced total CBF increase. In conclusion, the study demonstrated a greater hypoxia-induced decrease in BOLD response to visual stimulation in MA patients. We suggest this may represent a hypoxia-induced change in neuronal excitability or abnormal vascular response to visual stimulation, which may explain the increased sensibility to hypoxia in these patients leading to migraine attacks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据