4.6 Article

Decoding the ECD Spectra of Poly(phenylacetylene)s: Structural Significance

期刊

ACS OMEGA
卷 4, 期 3, 页码 5233-5240

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.9b00122

关键词

-

资金

  1. MINECO [CTQ2014-61470-EXP, CTQ2015-70519-P]
  2. Xunta de Galicia [GRC2014/040, ED431C 2017/17]
  3. Xunta de Galicia (Centro Singular de Investigacion de Galicia Accreditation 2016-2019) [ED431G/09]
  4. COST Action Molecules in Motion (MOLIM) [CM1405]
  5. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The role of the main dihedral angles in the electronic circular dichroism (ECD) spectra of poly-(phenylacetylene)s (PPAs) was estimated by using time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) for oligo-(phenylacetylene)s (n = 12). These studies reveal that in cis-transoidal arrangements, the first Cotton effect is dominated by excitations involving molecular orbitals (MOs) mainly related to the polyene backbone. Hence, for this scaffold, the +/- sign of the first Cotton effect reflects the P/M helical sense of the internal helix of the polymer. However, in cis-cisoidal arrangements, contribution of MOs in the polyene and the aryl rings of the PPA backbone produce the first Cotton effect band. As a result, two different ECD signatures with three or four alternating Cotton effects can be produced depending on the sign of the omega(1) and omega(3) dihedral angles which determine the helical sense of the polyene (omega(1)) and the relative orientation of the aryl ring toward the polyene (omega(3)), respectively. Thus, on the one hand, if omega(1) and omega(3) rotate in opposite directions, a CD with three alternating Cotton effects is observed, where the sign of first Cotton correlates with the P/M helical sense of the polyene. On the other hand, if omega(1) and omega(3) rotate in the same direction, a CD signature with four alternating Cotton effects is produced where the information relative to the P/M helical sense of the polyene is contained in the second Cotton effect.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据