4.3 Article

Ecological impacts of the austral-most population of Crassostrea gigas in South America: a matter of time?

期刊

ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH
卷 30, 期 6, 页码 979-987

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1007/s11284-015-1298-7

关键词

Crassostrea gigas; Invasive species; Facilitation; Epibiosis; Patagonia

类别

资金

  1. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica [PID 371]
  2. PIP CONICET [089, 508]
  3. FONCyT-PICT [2206]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas is one of the most invasive species worldwide. This oyster has a preponderant ecological role in the invaded environments, for example structuring the benthic community through the provision of micro-habitats. Twenty-five years after its introduction in Argentina, the species is colonizing new areas along the coast, extending northwards and southwards its local distribution. In this study, we provide the first ecological characterization of the southern-most population of C. gigas; where the composition, density, richness and diversity of the macroinvertebrate assemblages associated with zones with oysters were compared with zones where it is absent at four different times of the year. Additionally, the main epibionts taxa settled on the oyster shells were studied. Our results showed differences in the assemblage composition between zones. However, these differences were not consistent throughout the year. Furthermore, density, richness and diversity were higher in the zones with oysters only in one of the surveys and the parameters did not differ between zones in the remaining months. Moreover, the majority of oysters were used as settlement substrate by the sessile common species present in the area. Thus, our work provides new information about the ecology of C. gigas in recently invaded areas that enhance our understanding of the role that facilitation plays in physically stressful ecosystems and the importance that density and time since the invasion may have in the engineering effects of the species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据