3.8 Proceedings Paper

Cell voltage analysis of a 6 kW polymeric electrolyte fuel cell stack designed for hybrid power systems

期刊

MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 393-399

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.03.002

关键词

Polymeric electrolyte fuel cells; fuel cell degradation; fuel cell system management

资金

  1. Italian Ministry of University and Research [PON03PE_00109_1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A polymeric electrolyte Fuel Cell System (FCS) was experimentally studied for application as power generator in hybrid power systems. The electrochemical device was based on 96 individual cells and produced a maximum power of 6.2 kW. A dedicated DC-DC converter was inserted between the FCS, a Pb battery pack used as storage system, and a resistive variable electric load. The whole system was preliminarily characterized to evaluate FCS and DC-DC converter efficiency in the whole power range. The FCS operated at low pressure, without external humidification and in anode recirculation mode. As irregularities of cell voltages could be a sign of draining conditions for catalyzed electrodes and electrolytes, the cell voltage uniformity analysis was effected in both steady state and dynamic conditions. The coefficient of variation (C-v), was used as a measure of dispersion of cell voltage around the mean value. The experimental data evidence a satisfactory behavior of all cells in steady-state conditions in the entire power range (1-6 kW), with FCS+DC-DC converter efficiencies close to 50% and very low C-v values (<1.6%). Stack and cell performance remained high and reliable during most of transient phases of a dynamic test characterized by a high frequency of load variation steps. Power variation rates higher than 300 W/s determined C-v values close to 3-3.5%. These load ramp rates could be considered as a threshold range for the management of a low pressure self-humidified FCS in hybrid power system configurations. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据