4.6 Article

Dynamic Multi-Armed Bandit Algorithm for the Cyclic Bandwidth Sum Problem

期刊

IEEE ACCESS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 40258-40270

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2906840

关键词

Cyclic bandwidth sum problem; dynamic multi-armed bandit; adaptive operator selection; memetic algorithms

资金

  1. Mexican Secretariat of Public Education under Grant SEP-CINVESTAV (2019-2020) [00114]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Memetic algorithms (MAs) are a powerful resource when dealing with optimization problems, combining the diversification of the population-based approaches with the intensification of local search. However, their success depends on the combination of operators and their ability to cope with the intrinsic difficulties of a problem. Choosing the most suitable combination of operators that better suits a given problem (or a set of instances of a problem) has proved to be a defiant and time-consuming task. An approach to this task is the adaptive operator selection (AOS), based on the idea of choosing operators during execution time based on some reward system related to their performance. In this paper, we continue our previous work on studying the effectiveness of several operators of an MA to solve the cyclic bandwidth sum problem (CBSP), now extending the operator set and incorporating the dynamic multi-armed bandit (DMAB) framework to adaptively adjust the MA's operators. The resulting technique, named DMAB+MA, is compared to the independent MA versions in a full factorial experiment and with respect to two reference algorithms of the literature. It was found that the quality of the solutions achieved by DMAB+MA significantly improved the best-known results provided by the state-of-the-art algorithms while keeping the competitive execution times with respect to the independent MA versions. Moreover, DMAB+MA was able to provide optimal/best-known solutions for the 40 tested graphs (with different topologies) and to establish new better upper bounds for 12 of them.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据