4.6 Article

Structural response analysis of slamming impact on free fall lifeboats

期刊

MARINE STRUCTURES
卷 54, 期 -, 页码 112-126

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2017.03.004

关键词

Free fall lifeboat; Geometric nonlinearities; Preliminary ship design; Quasi-response; Slamming impact loads

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The evaluation of impact induced slamming loads experienced by ships and offshore structures using advanced fluid structure interaction methods may be a challenging task involving complex and time consuming engineering solutions. This is the reason why to date the application of well understood and validated quasi-response approaches remains the most rational alternative used by experts for preliminary design assessment. Based on a benchmark study carried out by the International Ship and Offshore Structures Congress Technical Committee 11.1 on Quasi-Static Response this paper demonstrates the practical use of quasi-response prediction methods for the assessment of impact loads on modern free fall lifeboats. The case study presented is considered relevant in terms of technical background and ship design for safety. Following a brief review rationalising the practical relevance of the engineering solutions examined, the influence of high speed impact is evaluated using linear-elastic and nonlinear beam models, as well as a nonlinear transient dynamic finite element analysis idealisation. Comparisons of the methods presented against experimental results led to the conclusion that the nonlinear quasi-dynamic beam approach accounts for the influence of the dynamic effects of strain by suitably idealising the effects of nonlinear geometric stiffness. It may therefore be more appropriate to employ this approach at preliminary stage, especially when conducting comparisons against simplistic linear methods used for rigid structures (e.g. stiffened steel and aluminium panels), or advanced nonlinear finite element analysis and other multi-physics methods that may be computationally complex and time consuming. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据