4.5 Article

Teams of Psychologists Helping Teams: The Evolution of the Science of Team Training

期刊

AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST
卷 74, 期 3, 页码 278-289

出版社

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/amp0000419

关键词

team training; teamwork; team performance; team development; multidisciplinary research

资金

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration [NNX16AP96G, NNX16AB08G]
  2. National Science Foundation [DGE 1450681]
  3. Ann and John Doerr Institute for New Leaders at Rice University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Team training contributes to improved performance, reduced errors, and even saving lives-and it exists today because psychologists collaborated across domains to contribute their expertise. Our objective was to highlight the salient role of multidisciplinary collaboration in the success of team training, an area driven by psychologists responding to real-world problems. In this article, we deliver (a) a historical account of team training research, acknowledging critical turning points that shaped the science; (b) a synthesis of major contributions from subdisciplines of psychology: and (c) a collection of lessons learned in the science and practice of team training. We begin with the history of problems that created a need for solutions and the psychologists across domains who worked together to develop a science to improve teamwork. We give poignant examples of fatal mistakes that incited action and enabled scientific breakthroughs through research partnerships. Next. we detail the theoretical drivers behind the science and the hands-on approach of investigating how we turn a team of experts into an expert team. We discuss the spectrum of team training research throughout time, including major influences that shifted dominant paradigms of thought, while emphasizing its multidisciplinary nature and the contributions of psychologists. Finally, we provide a list of lessons learned from a half-century of multidisciplinary research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据