4.7 Article

Development of a method for the quantitative metabolite profiling of pharmaceutical drugs using HPLC-ICP-MS following pre-column derivatization of their amino and hydroxyl groups using 4-aminopyridine as a model compound

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL ATOMIC SPECTROMETRY
卷 34, 期 4, 页码 708-715

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8ja00386f

关键词

-

资金

  1. China Scholarship Council (CSC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chemical derivatization allows the introduction of an ICP-MS accessible element into pharmaceuticals and their metabolites, thus extending the application range of HPLC-ICP-MS in pharmaceutical applications. In this study, such a pre-column derivatization approach was developed with the aim of using HPLC-ICP-MS for the quantitative metabolite profiling of pharmaceutical drugs in human plasma samples. We targeted the amino and hydroxyl groups, two of the most abundant functional groups present in drugs, and used 4-aminopyridine and 3-hydroxy-4-aminopyridine as model compounds. 4Iodobenzoyl chloride was used as a commercially available and multi-functional derivatization reagent to introduce iodine (I) as an element that can be quantified using ICP-MS with high sensitivity. This reagent reacts readily with the amino group present in 4-aminopyridine and the amino and hydroxyl groups present in its metabolite 3-hydroxy-4-aminopyridine. The reaction conditions were systematically optimized to guarantee quantitative formation of the target derivatives. Baseline separation of the target derivatives from one another and from also derivatized endogenous compounds was achieved using reversed phase UHPLC and gradient elution. Accuracy (recovery between 95 and 107%) and precision (repeatability # 6.9% RSD) were fit-for-purpose for both 4-aminopyridine and 3-hydroxy-4aminopyridine. The limit of quantification (LOQ) is 10 mu g L-1 for I, corresponding to 7.5 mu g L-1 of 4-aminopyridine and 5.8 mu g L-1 of 3-hydroxy-4-aminopyridine, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据