3.8 Article

Selection and Quantification of Objects in Microscopic Images: from Multi-Criteria to Multi-Threshold Analysis

期刊

BIONANOSCIENCE
卷 9, 期 1, 页码 59-65

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12668-018-0588-2

关键词

Microscopy; Image analysis; Cell sub-populations; Apoptotic; Fibers

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation [2.5475.2017/6.7]
  2. Russian Science Foundation [17-74-20065]
  3. Russian Science Foundation [17-74-20065] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Due to the increased number of applications of both microscopic imaging and image analysis including biomedical studies, the design of specialized algorithms and tools to facilitate quantitative assessment of objects in the image content is of urgent need. Recently, a number of approaches ranging from object counting by machine learning methods to statistical image analysis have been suggested and successfully implemented to resolve the cell quantification problem. Here, we revisit the above problem considering samples where objects presented in the same images have to be explicitly distinguished and quantified without involving any dedicated experimental setting like differential fluorescent staining. We consider several possible classification criteria and show explicitly how their combination in a single algorithm can be used to improve results in complex images where single criteria-based rules inevitably fail. Finally, we suggest a possible approach for the analysis of non-homogeneous images based on combining object selection results for different threshold values thus enhancing the algorithm from multi-criteria to multi-threshold analysis. To demonstrate the performance of the suggested solutions, we show several prominent examples of complex structures ranging from images containing both live and apoptotic cells as well as containing mixtures of globular and fibrous forms of heat-shock protein IbpA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据