4.3 Article

Diet composition and food consumption rate of harbor porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) in the western Baltic Sea

期刊

MARINE MAMMAL SCIENCE
卷 33, 期 4, 页码 1053-1079

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/mms.12421

关键词

Atlantic cod; Baltic Sea; food rations; gobies; harbor porpoise; herring; stomach contents; stomach residence time of otoliths

资金

  1. Danish Council for Strategic Research, Project IMAGE [09-067259/DSF]
  2. INSPIRE project, BONUS, the joint Baltic Sea research and development program [185]
  3. European Union's Seventh Programme for research, technological development and demonstration
  4. Federal German Agency for Nature Conservation [F+E FKZ: 805 85 018]
  5. Ministry of Renewable Energies, Agriculture, Environment and Rural Areas of Schleswig-Holstein, Germany

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stomach content composition and prey-specific consumption rates of juvenile and adult harbor porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) were estimated from a data set including 339 stomachs collected over a 32 yr period (1980-2011) in the western Baltic Sea. The stomach contents were mainly hard parts of fish prey and in particular otoliths. The bias originating from differential residence time of otoliths in the stomachs was addressed by use of a recently developed approach. Atlantic cod and herring were the main prey of adults, constituting on average 70% of the diet mass. Juvenile porpoises also frequently consumed gobies. Here, the mass contribution by gobies was on average 25%, which was as much as cod. Other species such as whiting, sprat, eelpout, and sandeels were of minor importance for both juveniles and adults. The diet composition differed between years, quarters, and porpoise acquisition method. Yearly consumption rates for porpoises in the western Baltic Sea were obtained in three scenarios on the daily energy requirements of a porpoise in combination with an estimate including the 95% CLs of the porpoise population size. Cod of age groups 1 and 2 and intermediate-sized herring suffered the highest predation from porpoises.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据