4.6 Article

A N, S dual doping strategy via electrospinning to prepare hierarchically porous carbon polyhedra embedded carbon nanofibers for flexible supercapacitors

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 7, 期 15, 页码 9040-9050

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8ta12246f

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21771064, 21875068]
  2. Innovative Research Team of Anhui Provincial Education Department [2016SCXPTTD]
  3. Key Discipline of Material Science and Engineering of Suzhou University [2017XJZDXK3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Currently, electrospun carbon nanofibers (ECNFs) have attracted much attention due to their flexibility and easy fabrication. However, ECNFs generally show poor electrical conductivity, greatly limiting their practical application. In this work, flexible hierarchically porous carbon polyhedra embedded carbon nanofibers doped with N and S (NSCPCNF) were synthesized by electrospinning a metal-organic framework ZIF-67 and a thiourea incorporated polyacrylonitrile precursor with subsequent carbonization. Due to the enhanced specific surface area, improved charge transfer ability and pseudocapacitive contribution by N, S dual doping, the as-obtained NSCPCNF shows a much higher specific capacitance of 396 F g(-1) at a current density of 1 A g(-1) in 1 mol L-1 H2SO4 electrolyte (three-electrode mode) than that of ECNFs (192 F g(-1)). More importantly, a flexible supercapacitor (FSC) assembled using NSCPCNF electrodes achieves a high specific capacitance of 103 F g(-1) at a current density of 0.5 A g(-1) (two-electrode mode), and a high energy density of 14.3 W h kg(-1) at a power density of 250 W kg(-1), which outperforms most of the reported ECNF based FSCs, and it also exhibits a high capacitance retention (107% of the initial value after 3000 charge-discharge cycles) and superior bending stability. The strategy proposed in this work provides the feasibility to explore high-performance flexible electrode materials for FSCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据