4.5 Review

Cyclic steps and related supercritical bedforms: Building blocks of deep-water depositional systems, western North America

期刊

MARINE GEOLOGY
卷 393, 期 -, 页码 4-20

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.margeo.2016.12.009

关键词

-

资金

  1. Quantitative Clastics Laboratory

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cyclic steps are long-wave (the ratio of wavelength to height is >> 1), upstream-migrating, upper-flow-regime bedforms bounded by internal hydraulic jumps (i.e., transition from densimetric Froude supercritical to subcritical flow) in turbidity currents. They commonly occur in regions with high gradients and slope breaks. Here we review the morphodynamic evolution and depositional products of cyclic steps and related supercritical bedforms (e.g., antidunes). We present examples from high-resolution geophysical surveys and monitoring of continental margins in western North America integrated with physically based numerical modeling of turbidity currents and associated bedforms. We compare numerical modeling results to direct monitoring of turbidity currents in the Squamish prodelta, British Columbia, Canada. Cyclic steps and antidunes influence phases of canyon channel evolution, levee-overbank deposition, and channel-lobe-transition-zone sedimentation, thereby advancing channels and lobes into the basin. Bedforms range from relatively small cyclic steps and antidunes within active submarine canyons and channels (similar to 10(1) m wavelength; similar to 10(0) m height) to large cyclic steps in less confined levee-overbank environments and the channel-lobe transition zone (similar to 10(3) m wavelength; similar to 10(2) m height). Cyclic steps and related supercritical bedforms are important to the morphodynamic evolution of architectural elements of some deep-water depositional systems, especially those located along tectonically active margins with high gradients and slope breaks that can promote internal hydraulic jumps in turbidity currents. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据