4.5 Article

Land use change effects on carbon and nitrogen stocks in the Pyrenees during the last 150 years: A modeling approach

期刊

ECOLOGICAL MODELLING
卷 312, 期 -, 页码 322-334

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.06.005

关键词

Pyrenees; C pools; N available; Ecological modeling; FORECAST model; Land use change

类别

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [AGL2012-33465]
  2. Ramon y Cajal [RYC-2011-08082]
  3. Marie Curie Action [CIG-2012-326718-ECOPYREN3]
  4. Spanish Predoctoral Research Grant [BES-2013-066705]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the southern Pyrenees, human population and therefore land uses have changed from forests to pastures, then crops, and back to pastures and secondary forests during the last two centuries. To understand what such rapid land use changes have meant for carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) stocks, we used data from two forest sites in the western Pyrenees, combined with regional data on pastures and crop production (potato, cereal), to calibrate the ecosystem-level model FORECAST. Then, we simulated 150 years of land use for each site, emulating historical changes. Our estimates show that the conversion from forests into pastures and crops created C and N deficits (378-427 Mg C ha(-1), 4.0-4.6 Mg N ha(-1)) from which these sites are still recovering. The main ecological process behind the creation of these deficits was the loss of the ecological legacy of soil organic matter (SUM) created by the forest, particularly during conversion to farming. Pastures were able to reverse, stop or at least slow down the loss of such legacy. In conclusion, our work shows the deep impact of historical land use in ecosystem attributes, both in magnitude of removed C and N stocks and in duration of such impact. Also, the usefulness of ecological modeling in absence of historical data to estimate such changes is showcased, providing a framework for potential C and N stocks to be reached by climate change mitigation measures such as forest restoration. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据