4.7 Article

A Novel Exopolysaccharide with Metal Adsorption Capacity Produced by a Marine Bacterium Alteromonas sp JL2810

期刊

MARINE DRUGS
卷 15, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI AG
DOI: 10.3390/md15060175

关键词

exopolysaccharide; marine bacteria; Alteromonas; metal adsorption

资金

  1. National Key Research Program [2016YFA0601400]
  2. State Oceanic Administration (SOA) [GASI-03-01-02-05]
  3. National Key Basic Research Program of China [2013CB955700]
  4. NSFC [91428308]
  5. Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences Division, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-93ER20097]
  6. [CNOOC-KJ 125 FZDXM 00TJ 001-2014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most marine bacteria can produce exopolysaccharides (EPS). However, very few structures of EPS produced by marine bacteria have been determined. The characterization of EPS structure is important for the elucidation of their biological functions and ecological roles. In this study, the structure of EPS produced by a marine bacterium, Alteromonas sp. JL2810, was characterized, and the biosorption of the EPS for heavy metals Cu2+, Ni2+, and Cr6+ was also investigated. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) analysis indicated that the JL2810 EPS have a novel structure consisting of the repeating unit of [-3)--Rhap-(13)--Manp-(14)--3OAc-GalAp-(1]. The biosorption of the EPS for heavy metals was affected by a medium pH; the maximum biosorption capacities for Cu2+ and Ni2+ were 140.8 +/- 8.2 mg/g and 226.3 +/- 3.3 mg/g at pH 5.0; however, for Cr6+ it was 215.2 +/- 5.1 mg/g at pH 5.5. Infrared spectrometry analysis demonstrated that the groups of O-H, C=O, and C-O-C were the main function groups for the adsorption of JL2810 EPS with the heavy metals. The adsorption equilibrium of JL2810 EPS for Ni2+ was further analyzed, and the equilibrium data could be better represented by the Langmuir isotherm model. The novel EPS could be potentially used in industrial applications as a novel bio-resource for the removal of heavy metals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据