4.5 Article

Characterization and evaluation of AIRS-based estimates of the deuterium content of water vapor

期刊

ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES
卷 12, 期 4, 页码 2331-2339

出版社

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/amt-12-2331-2019

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Single-pixel tropospheric retrievals of HDO and H2O concentrations are retrieved from Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) radiances using the optimal estimation algorithm developed for the Aura Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer (TES) project. We evaluate the error characteristics and vertical sensitivity of AIRS measurements corresponding to 5 d of TES data (or five global surveys) during the Northern Hemisphere summers between 2006 and 2010 (similar to 600 co-located comparisons per day). We find that the retrieval characteristics of the AIRS deuterium content measurements have similar vertical resolution in the middle troposphere as TES but with slightly less sensitivity in the lowermost troposphere, with a typical degrees of freedom (DOFS) in the tropics of 1.5. The calculated measurement uncertainty is similar to 30 parts per thousand (parts per thousand relative to the deuterium composition of ocean water) for a tropospheric average between 750 and 350 hPa, the altitude region where AIRS is most sensitive, compared to similar to 15 parts per thousand for the TES data. Comparison with the TES data also indicates that the uncertainty of a single target AIRS HDO/H2O measurement is similar to 30 parts per thousand. Comparison of AIRS and TES data between 30 degrees S and 50 degrees N indicates that the AIRS data are biased low by similar to -2.6 parts per thousand with a latitudinal variation of similar to 7.8 parts per thousand. This latitudinal variation is consistent with the accuracy of TES data compared to in situ measurements, suggesting that both AIRS and TES have similar accuracy. Copyright statement. The author's copyright for this publication is transferred to the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据