4.8 Article

Making the move towards modernized greener separations: introduction of the analytical method greenness score (AMGS) calculator

期刊

GREEN CHEMISTRY
卷 21, 期 7, 页码 1816-1826

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8gc03875a

关键词

-

资金

  1. American Chemical Society Green Chemistry Institute Pharmaceutical Roundtable

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Green and sustainable processes to develop and manufacture pharmaceuticals using eco-friendly and environmentally responsible means have been underway for over 25 years. These include the major analytical chemistry techniques used for pharmaceutical characterization. The pharmaceutical industry as a whole needs to responsibly transition away from traditional chromatographic methodologies that include the use of longer columns, extended run times, toxic non-polar solvents (e.g. heptanes and hexanes for normal phase liquid chromatography) and their accompanying large solvent volume consumption - toward more efficient, greener solutions. Over the last decade, high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) and supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) techniques have undergone substantial improvements to instrumentation (e.g. UHPLC and UHPSFC) and column particle technologies, all of which lead to faster and more efficient separations while reducing development and validation time for both chiral and achiral analyses. However, many of these advances have yet to be globally adopted in later stage drug development and manufacturing where chromatographic process usage requires multiple analyses for every method transfer, validation, and clinical supply campaign. In order to emphasize greener method alternatives, we introduce a new approach to definitively establish the impact of method design and instrument selection choices. Our aim is to provide awareness and guidance to the global industry with a single unified, straightforward metric that clearly shows the benefit of selecting more modernized, safer and more environmentally-friendly methods and techniques without compromising separation performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据