4.4 Article

Evidence for a sensitive period in the effects of early life stress on hippocampal volume

期刊

DEVELOPMENTAL SCIENCE
卷 22, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/desc.12775

关键词

adversity; early life stress; hippocampus; sensitive period

资金

  1. National Science Foundation
  2. National Institute of Mental Health [F32-MH107129, K01-MH106805, R37-MH101495]
  3. Jacobs Foundation Early Career Research Fellowship
  4. Brain and Behavior Research Foundation [23582, 23819]
  5. Klingenstein Third Generation Foundation
  6. Stanford Precision Health and Integrated Diagnostics Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Exposure to stress has been causally linked to changes in hippocampal volume (HV). Given that the hippocampus undergoes rapid changes in the first years of life, stressful experiences during this period may be particularly important in understanding individual differences in the development of the hippocampus. One hundred seventy-eight early adolescents (ages 9-13 years; 43% male) were interviewed regarding exposure to and age of onset of experiences of stress; the severity of each stressful event was rated by an objective panel. All participants underwent structural magnetic resonance imaging, from which HVs were automatically segmented. Without considering the age of onset for stressful experiences, there was a small but statistically significant negative association of stress severity with bilateral HV. When considering the age of onset, there was a moderate and significant negative association between stress severity during early childhood (through 5 years of age) and HV; there was no association between stress severity during later childhood (age 6 years and older) and HV. We provide evidence of a sensitive period through 5 years of age for the effects of life stress on HV in adolescence. It will be important in future research to elucidate how reduced HV stemming from early life stress may contribute to stress-related health outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据