Impact of prior distributions and central tendency measures on Bayesian intravoxel incoherent motion model fitting

PurposeBayesian model fitting has been proposed as a robust alternative for intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) model-fitting parameter estimation. However, consensus regarding choice of prior distribution and posterior distribution central tendency measure is needed. The aim of this study was to compare the quality of IVIM parameter estimates produced by different prior distributions and central tendency measures, and to gain knowledge about the effect of these choices. MethodsThree prior distributions (uniform, reciprocal, and lognormal) and two measures of central tendency (mean and mode) found in the literature were studied using simulations and in vivo data from a tumor mouse model. ResultsSimulations showed that the uniform and lognormal priors were superior to the reciprocal prior, especially for the parameters D and f and clinically relevant SNR levels. The choice of central tendency measure had less effect on the results, but had some effects on estimation bias. Results based on simulations and in vivo data agreed well, indicating high validity of the simulations. ConclusionsChoice of prior distribution and central tendency measure affects the results of Bayesian IVIM parameter estimates. This must be considered when comparing results from different studies. The best overall quality of IVIM parameter estimates was obtained using the lognormal prior. Magn Reson Med 79:1674-1683, 2018. (c) 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.