4.5 Article

Improved magnetic resonance fingerprinting reconstruction with low-rank and subspace modeling

期刊

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
卷 79, 期 2, 页码 933-942

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.26701

关键词

model-based imaging; low-rank modeling; subspace modeling; MR fingerprinting; relaxometry; quantitative MRI

资金

  1. National Institute of Health [NIH-R01-EB017219, NIH-R01-EB017337, NIH-R01-NS089212, NIH-P41-EB015896, NIH-U01-MH093765, NIH-R24-MH106096]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PurposeThis article introduces a constrained imaging method based on low-rank and subspace modeling to improve the accuracy and speed of MR fingerprinting (MRF). Theory and MethodsA new model-based imaging method is developed for MRF to reconstruct high-quality time-series images and accurate tissue parameter maps (e.g., T-1, T-2, and spin density maps). Specifically, the proposed method exploits low-rank approximations of MRF time-series images, and further enforces temporal subspace constraints to capture magnetization dynamics. This allows the time-series image reconstruction problem to be formulated as a simple linear least-squares problem, which enables efficient computation. After image reconstruction, tissue parameter maps are estimated via dictionary-based pattern matching, as in the conventional approach. ResultsThe effectiveness of the proposed method was evaluated with in vivo experiments. Compared with the conventional MRF reconstruction, the proposed method reconstructs time-series images with significantly reduced aliasing artifacts and noise contamination. Although the conventional approach exhibits some robustness to these corruptions, the improved time-series image reconstruction in turn provides more accurate tissue parameter maps. The improvement is pronounced especially when the acquisition time becomes short. ConclusionsThe proposed method significantly improves the accuracy of MRF, and also reduces data acquisition time. Magn Reson Med 79:933-942, 2018. (c) 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据