4.3 Article

Patients' Intensive Telephone-Based Care Program Reduces Depression in Coronary Artery Disease Patients and May Contribute to Favorable Overall Survival by Decreasing Depression

期刊

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING
卷 34, 期 3, 页码 236-243

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000571

关键词

coronary artery disease; depression; survival; telephone intervention

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of patients' intensive telephone-based care program (PITC) on depression and its correlation with overall survival in patients with coronary artery disease who have depression. Methods: A total of 224 patients with coronary artery disease who were complicated with depression were allocated randomly to the PITC group and control group in a 1:1 ratio. In the PITC group, PITC and usual care were performed, whereas in the control group, only usual care was given. Depression was assessed using Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Depression (HADS-D) score and Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) score. Results: No difference in baseline characteristics was found between the PITC and control groups (all P>.05). There were changes the HADS-D score (P=.002) and SDS score (P=.019) from baseline (M0) to month 12 (M12) in the PITC group. Those in the PITC group had a reduced depression rate (assessed by HADS-D score <8 at month 12) (P=.005). As for overall survival analysis, Kaplan-Meier curves revealed that overall survival was numerically longer in the PITC group compared with the control group but displayed no statistical significance (P=.061), whereas patients without depression at month 12 presented with better overall survival compared with patients with depression at month 12, as assessed by HADS-D (P=.041) or SDS (P=.014). Conclusions: A PITC could serve as an effective means to decrease depression, and it might contribute to favorable overall survival by decreasing depression in patients with coronary artery disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据