4.6 Article

Tuning the dipole moments of nonfullerene acceptors with an asymmetric terminal strategy forhighly efficient organic solar cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 7, 期 15, 页码 8889-8896

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8ta12530a

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSFC [U1704137, 21404031, 21574013]
  2. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University, Key Research Project of Henan Province [19zx014]
  3. Program for Young Scholar - Henan Province [2016GGJS-021]
  4. Program from Henan University [yqpy20140058]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The - stacking of terminal electron-deficient groups is known to support the main charge transport pathway in acceptor-donor-acceptor type fused-ring electron acceptors (FREAs). Interactions between terminal groups influence molecular stacking and ultimate photovoltaic performances. Herein, we designed two novel asymmetric FREAs bearing different polar terminal groups via a facile stepwise Knoevenagel condensation. The combination of two terminal groups with differing polarities in a single molecule fine-tuned the absorption and energy levels. Furthermore, the different terminal groups induced a permanent dipole moment over the whole molecule with regional dipole moments at the end regions. These effects enabled control over intermolecular interactions, crystallization properties, and the blended microscopic morphology. Single-junction solar cells based on the asymmetric a-IT-2OM in combination with the widely used polymer donor PBDB-T yielded power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) as high as 12.07%, which represents a 30%-increase compared with that of the control device. Notably, devices based on PBDB-T/a-IT-2OM retained high PCEs greater than 11% for active layer thicknesses up to 200 nm; PCEs of approximately 9% were maintained even at a thickness of 450 nm. These findings offer a route to high performance FREA molecules for thick-film solar cell devices and also provide a novel asymmetric molecular design strategy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据