4.7 Article

Polymer Diffusion from Attractive and Athermal Substrates

期刊

MACROMOLECULES
卷 50, 期 7, 页码 3038-3042

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.7b00086

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation NSF/EPSRC Materials World Network [DMR-1210379]
  2. EPSRC [EP/5065373/1]
  3. NSF [DMR15-07713]
  4. Dupont Central Research and Development
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korean government [NRF-2015R1C1A1A01052865]
  6. [NSF/MRSEC-DMR 11-20901]
  7. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  8. Division Of Materials Research [1507713] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  9. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/J018503/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. EPSRC [EP/J018503/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Given the exceedingly high interfacial area-to-volume ratios in polymer nanocomposites and the ability to manipulate the polymer/nanoparticle interfacial interactions, manipulating the chain dynamics at these interfaces has immense potential for impacting macroscopic properties. There, the polymer center-of-mass tracer diffusion coefficient (D) from attractive (hydroxyl terminated) and athermal (phenyl-terminated or polymer-grafted) substrates was measured over a range of temperatures and tracer molecular weights using elastic recoil detection. The tracer polymer diffusion slows significantly relative to the bulk when polymers are in direct contact with an attractive substrate and exhibits a weaker molecular weight dependence, D M M. For polymers without direct contacts on the attractive substrates and for athermal substrates, the diffusion coefficients are similar to the bulk case. The temperature dependence of these diffusion coefficients indicates that the slower diffusion at the interfaces is coupled to differences in polymer conformation and smaller fractional free volumes. These deviations from bulk are more pronounced for higher molecular weights and more attractive interfaces.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据