4.7 Article

Order and Disorder in High χ/Low N, Broad Dispersity ABA Triblock Polymers

期刊

MACROMOLECULES
卷 50, 期 17, 页码 6779-6787

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.7b01452

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DMR-1307606, DMR-1631598]
  2. NSF [CHE-9974839]
  3. University of Wisconsin NSEC [DMR-0832760]
  4. CEMRI are part of the NSF [DMR-1121288]
  5. Northwestern University
  6. E.I. DuPont de Nemours Co.
  7. Dow Chemical Company
  8. DOE Office of Science by Argonne National Laboratory [DE-AC02-06CH11357]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using a combination of small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM), we document the composition-dependent morphologies of 39 new poly(lactide-block-1,4-butadiene-block-lactide) (LBL) block polymers, comprising a broad dispersity B segment (M-n = 4.5-17.7 kg/mol; D = M-w/M-n = 1.72-1.88) and narrow dispersity L end blocks (M-n = 0.6-15.3 kg/mol; D = 1.10-1.21) with volume fractions 0.26 <= f(B) <= 0.95. A subset of these samples undergo melt self-assembly into cylindrical, lamellar, and apparently bicontinuous morphologies. By assessing the states of order and disorder in these triblock polymer melts using temperature-dependent SAXS, we find that broad B segment dispersity increases the minimum segregation strength chi N greater than or similar to 27 required for LBL triblock self-assembly relative to the self-consistent mean-field theory prediction chi N >= 17.9 for narrow dispersity analogues. While B segment dispersity has previously been shown to thermodynamically stabilize the self-assembled morphologies of low chi/high N ABA triblocks, the present study indicates that broad B block dispersity in related high chi/low N systems destabilizes the microphase-separated melt. These observations are rationalized in terms of recent theories that suggest that broad segmental dispersity substantially enhances fluctuation effects at low N, thus disfavoring melt segregation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据