4.3 Article

Structural, thermal, and tribological properties of poly(vinylidene fluoride)/nano-TiO2 composites prepared by dry-mixing and hot-press technique

期刊

MACROMOLECULAR RESEARCH
卷 25, 期 4, 页码 365-373

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13233-017-5041-9

关键词

composite; poly(vinylidene fluoride); TiO2; friction coefficient; taber abrasion

资金

  1. Converged Energy Materials Research Center Program of the Defense Acquisition Program Administration
  2. Agency for Defense Development
  3. Korea Research Foundation - Korean Government [NRF-2014R1A2A2A09052374]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper describes the morphological, thermal, and tribological characteristics of poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF)-based composites dispersed with nanosized TiO2 (nano-TiO2) particles. PVDF/nano-TiO2 composites with different nano-TiO2 loading (similar to 40 wt%) were prepared via a dry-mixing and uniaxial hot-press molding technique. The incorporation of nano-TiO2 led to changes in the crystal structure of the PVDF, as characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, thermogravimetric analysis, and differential scanning calorimetry. The uniform distribution and good interactions of the composites were confirmed by scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive spectrometry. The frictional performances increased with the amount of nano-TiO2 owing to the preferential formation of a nonpolar alpha-phase crystal and the reduced viscoelastic characteristics of the PVDF. The PVDF/nano-TiO2 composite with 30% loading exhibited the best frictional performance (a staticfriction coefficient of 0.23 and a kinetic-friction coefficient of 0.17), which is comparable to that of the composite prepared via a costly, environmentally unfriendly wet-mixing technique. Furthermore, the taber abrasion resistances were comparable to that of commercialized ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE), indicating the effectiveness of PVDF/nano-TiO2 hybridization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据