4.7 Article

Impacts of forest cover change on ecosystem services in high Andean mountains

期刊

ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
卷 48, 期 -, 页码 63-75

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.07.043

关键词

Landscape capacity; Land cover change; Forest transition; Ecosystem services; Paramo; Pine plantations; Andes; Ecuador

资金

  1. Belgian Federal Science Policy Programme BELSPO [Stereo II SR/00/133]
  2. Secretaria de Educacion Superior de Ciencia, Tecnologia e Innovacion de la Republica del Ecuador [20130107]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Land conversion affects the delivery of ecosystem goods and services. In this study, we used a 50 years time series of land cover maps to assess the potential impacts of forest cover changes on ecosystem services. A multi-source data integration strategy was followed to reduce inconsistencies in land cover change detection that result from the comparison of historical aerial photographs and satellite images. Our forest cover change analysis highlighted a shift from net deforestation to net reforestation in the early 1990s, consistent with the forest transition theory. When taking the nature of forest cover changes into account, our data show that the areal increase of the forested area was not associated with an improvement in ecological conditions. The overall capacity of the landscape to deliver ecosystem services dropped steadily by 16% over the 50 years' study period. Conversion of native forests to agricultural land was associated with the strongest decline in ecosystem services. Conversion of natural grasslands into pine plantations mostly led to negative and probably irreversible impacts on the delivery of ecosystem services. Conversion of degraded agricultural lands into pine plantations led to an improvement in ecological conditions. An effective spatial targeting of forestation programs has the potential to maximize the environmental benefits that forest plantations may offer while minimizing their environmental harm. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据