4.7 Article

Contamination of fermented foods in Nigeria with fungi

期刊

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 86, 期 -, 页码 76-84

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2017.07.044

关键词

Mycobiota; Fermentation; Moisture content; Fungi; Nigeria

资金

  1. Organisation for Women in Science in the Developing World (OWSD), Italy through the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA), Centre of Excellence for Food Security and Safety (COE), South Africa
  2. University of Johannesburg, South Africa via the Global Excellence and Stature (GES) Scholarship
  3. L'OREAL UNESCO (For Women in Science)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study assessed the safety and quality of some fermented foods in Nigeria. Cluster sampling was used to obtain different fermented foods: maize gruel (ogi), locust beans (iru), sorghum meal (ogi baba), dried locust beans (dried iru), African oil bean seed (ugba) and melon (ogiri) from Southwest Nigeria. Moisture content, Total Titratable Acidity, pH, and fungal diversity within each sample were determined. The identity of the isolates was established through macroscopic, microscopic and molecular biology means. The moisture content and pH of analysed samples ranged from 12 to 56% and 3.60 to 8.08, respectively. The overall data on the mycobiota of the fermented foods revealed that total fungal loads of ugba and ogiri were 1.05 x 10(5) and 7.9 x 10(5) cfu/g, respectively. Generally, fungal isolates belonged to 17 genera including Aspergillus, Fusarium, Candida, Saccharomyces and Penicillium. The dominant fungi detected were A. flavus and all analysed samples were contaminated with F. verticillioides except for ogi baba. The study led to the discovery of new fungal strains and previously unreported fungal species in the selected fermented foods. The analysed fermented foods were highly contaminated with different fungal species that could potentially be toxigenic in producing various types of mycotoxins. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据