4.7 Article

Ready-made meal packaging - A survey of needs and wants among Finnish and Dutch 'current' and 'future' seniors

期刊

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 79, 期 -, 页码 579-585

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2016.11.014

关键词

Senior consumers; Food packaging; Ready-made meal; Age; Online data collection

资金

  1. Finnish Funding Agency for Innovation (Tekes)
  2. Wageningen University and Research Centre in the Netherlands
  3. Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation
  4. Taloustutkimus Oy in Finland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For older populations, improved ready-made meal packaging may potentially contribute to adequate nutritional intakes, and in turn facilitate maintenance of independent living. Consequently, a deeper understanding of the features of ready-made meal packages important for older people is a step towards this goal. Features of ready-made meal packaging appreciated by 'current' (aged 65 >= years) and 'future' (aged 55-64 years) seniors were studied as an internet survey in Finland (n = 764) and in the Netherlands (n = 457). Only minor significant differences were found between these two senior groups. The four packaging features most valued by both the Finnish and Dutch consumers were: easy readability, easy disposability and recyclability, visibility of the contents, and easy opening. These features were basically the same regardless of age group, gender or country. Older people did not show interest either in multi packages or in eating meals directly from the package. Future senior men frequently using ready-made meals were identified as a promising target segment for the development and marketing of novel readymade meals. More generally, special attention should be paid in package design to age-relevant features, such as easy opening and easy-to-read information, and the impact of culture-specific translation of the features into packaging design. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据