4.7 Article

Applicative effect of glycinin basic polypeptide in fresh wet noodles and antifungal characteristics

期刊

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 83, 期 -, 页码 267-274

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2017.05.028

关键词

GBP; Sensory properties; Antimicrobial activities; Aspergillus niger; Penicillium sp.

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31371839]
  2. Major Plan of Study and Development [2015GSF120006]
  3. Program for Science and Technology Innovation Team in Universities of Henan Province [16IRTSTHN007]
  4. Science and Technology Development Project of Shandong Province [2014GSF121039]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We aimed to evaluate applicative effect of glycinin basic polypeptide (GBP) on fresh wet noodles during 5 days storage at 4 degrees C and to investigate its antifungal characteristics against Aspergillus niger (A. niger) and Penicillium sp.. GBP enhanced the sensory scores for fresh wet noodles and reduced the total plate count of fungi in a dose-dependent manner during storage. More than 2.0 mg/g GBP had well preservative effect on fresh wet noodles with 4 days shelf life at 4 degrees C. The inhibition zone diameters for A. niger and Penicillium sp. increased with increasing GBP concentration. The minimum inhibition concentrations of GBP against A. niger and Penicillium sp. were 2.0 and 1.5 mg/mL, respectively. GBP could effectively inhibit mycelial growth and spore germination of A. niger and Penicillium sp.. The ergosterol content (EC) in the fungal plasma membrane decreased with the increase in GBP concentration. What is more, EC of fungi with 2.4 mg/mL GBP had significant different from other concentrations of GBP (p < 0.05). Thus, GBP had remarkable antifungal effects by inhibiting growth of mycelium and spore germination, and disrupting the plasma membrane of fungi. GBP might be an alternative to synthetic antifungal preservatives in starchy food to extend shelf life. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据