4.5 Article

Prognostic and predictive effects of TP53 co-mutation in patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

期刊

LUNG CANCER
卷 111, 期 -, 页码 23-29

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.06.014

关键词

TP53; EGFR; Non-small cell lung cancer; Survival; Tyrosine kinase inhibitors

资金

  1. Novartis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction TP53 mutations are common in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and have been reported as prognostic of poor outcome. The impact of TP53 co-mutations in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated NSCLC is unclear. Materials and methods: Tissue from 105 patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre was analyzed by next-generation or Sanger sequencing to determine TP53 mutational status. Associations between TP53 status and baseline patient and tumor characteristics, treatments and outcomes (relapse-free survival [RFS] after surgical resection, overall survival [OS], overall response rate [ORR] and progression-free survival [PFS] on EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors [TKIs]), were investigated. Results: Dual TP53/EGFR mutations were found in 43/105 patients (41%). Among 76 patients who underwent surgical resection, neither RFS (HR 0.99, CI 0.56-1.75, p = 0.96) nor OS (HR 1.39, CI 0.70-2.77; p = 0.35) was associated with TP53 status. Sixty patients (24 TP53 MUT; 36 TP53 WT) received first-generation EGFR TKIs for advanced disease. ORR was not significantly different (TP53 MUT 54%, WT 66%, p = 0.42). There was a nonsignificant trend towards shorter PFS on EGFR TKIs with TP53 mutation (HR 1.74, CI 0.98-3.10, p = 0.06). When limited to TP53 missense mutations (n = 17), PFS was significantly shorter (HR 1.91, CI 1.01-3.60, p = 0.04). Among 11 evaluable patients treated with T790M inhibitors, ORR was not significantly different (TP53 MUT 3/3 [100%], WT 7/8 [88%]). Conclusions: Patients with dual TP53/EGFR mutations, especially missense mutations, had marginally lower response rates and shorter PFS when treated with EGFR TM therapy. Larger datasets are required to validate these observations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据