4.6 Article

An Efficient Certificateless Aggregate Signature Scheme Without Pairings for Healthcare Wireless Sensor Network

期刊

IEEE ACCESS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 42683-42693

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2907298

关键词

Healthcare wireless sensor network; certificateless public key cryptography; elliptic curve discrete logarithm problem; aggregate signature

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61402015]
  2. Basic Research Foundation of Natural Science in Shaanxi Province [2017JM6048]
  3. MOE Layout Foundation of Humanities and Social Sciences [19YJA790007]
  4. Key Foundation of Baoji University of Arts and Sciences [ZK15027]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Wireless sensor network (WSN) can be widely used in the field of health care since it has many advantages, such as low cost, high efficiency, low latency, and so on. In healthcare wireless sensor network (HWSN), the patients' health information needs to be transmitted to health professionals in real time through the Internet, so it is vital to ensure the integrity and privacy of medical information. Aggregate signature (AS) cannot only provide message integrity and authentication for multiple users but also drastically improve the efficiency of signature transmission and verification. Certificateless public key cryptography (CLPKC) is superior to traditional public key infrastructure and identity-based cryptography. We combine the advantages of CLPKC and AS and construct a certificateless aggregate signature (CLAS) scheme without using pairings. Our CLAS scheme realizes the protection of the privacy and integrity of healthcare information for multiple patients in HWSN for the first time. Under the assumption of elliptic curve discrete logarithm, the proposed CLAS scheme is existentially unforgettable against two types of adversaries. In addition, the scheme has better performance than other CLAS schemes as for the security, communication overhead, and computational costs. So it is more suitable for green HWSN.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据