4.6 Article

Heavy metal contamination in sediments from typical lakes in the five geographic regions of China: Distribution, bioavailability, and risk

期刊

ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING
卷 81, 期 -, 页码 243-255

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.04.047

关键词

Trace metals; Acid-volatile sulfides; Simultaneously extracted metals; Ecological risk; Lakes

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41201509]
  2. [2009ZX07106-001]
  3. [2012ZX07101-002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To overall evaluate the heavy metal status and risk in the lake sediments from five geographic regions in China, an integrated survey of metals including Mn, Cu, Zn, Pb, Ni, Co, Cr, and Cd was conducted in September 2011 in 34 lakes of the five regions of China: Eastern Plain Region (EPR), Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau (YGP), Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (QTP), Mongolia-Xinjiang Plateau (MXP), and Northeast China Region (NCR). Different lacustrine regions showed different distribution, bioavailability, and risk of metals. EPR and NCR showed a clear anthropogenic impact and a high pollution risk; the nonresidual fractions of Pb and Cd were the dominant fraction. YGP clearly showed a higher background value of metals; the presence of organic matter significantly affected the distribution of acid-volatile sulfides (AVS). MXP and QTP clearly showed natural weathering and erosion. Although the concentrations of Cu, Co, Ni, Cr, and Zn exceeded the threshold effect concentration, their residual fractions were dominant, indicating no harmful effect. Cd was related to anthropogenic pollution and risk factor in the five lake regions, particularly in EPR and NCR with densely populated areas having a higher Cd content in soil and rice. Dahuofang, Shengji, Basongcuo, Chaohu, Wuchang, Huayuan, and Huanghu lakes have adverse biological effect; therefore, the use of water from these lakes for drinking, aquaculture, and agriculture should be concerned. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据