4.3 Article

TIME-DOMAIN AND FREQUENCY-DOMAIN REFLECTOMETRY TYPE SOIL MOISTURE SENSOR PERFORMANCE AND SOIL TEMPERATURE EFFECTS IN FINE- AND COARSE-TEXTURED SOILS

期刊

APPLIED ENGINEERING IN AGRICULTURE
卷 35, 期 2, 页码 117-134

出版社

AMER SOC AGRICULTURAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.13031/aea.12908

关键词

Capacitance; Frequency-domain reflectometry; Soil moisture; Time-domain reflectometry

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [DBI-1331895]
  2. National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Dr. Irmak's Hatch Project [NEB-21-155]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The performances of six time-domain reflectometry (TDR) and frequency-domain reflectometry (FDR) type soil moisture sensors were investigated for measuring volumetric soil-water content (theta(nu)) in two different soil types. Soil-specific calibration equations were developed for each sensor using calibrated neutron probe-measured theta(nu.) Sensors were also investigated for their performance response in measuring theta(nu) to changes in soil temperature. The performance of all sensors was significantly different (P<0.05) than the neutron probe-measured theta(nu) with the same sensor also exhibiting variation between soils. In the silt loam soil, the 5TE sensor had the lowest root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.041 m(3)/m(3), indicating the best performance among all sensors investigated. The performance ranking of the other sensors from high performance to low was: TDR300 (High Clay Mode), CS616 (H) and 10HS, SA4150, TDR300 (Standard Mode), and CS616 (V) (H: horizontal installation and V: vertical installation). In the loamy sand, the CS616 (H) performed best with an RMSE of 0.014 m(3)/m(3) and the performance ranking of other sensors was: 5TE, CS616 (V), TDR300 (S), SA4150, and 10HS. When theta(nu) was near or above field capacity, the performance error of most sensors increased. Most sensors exhibited a linear response to increase in soil temperature. Most sensors exhibited substantial sensitivity to changes in soil temperature and the a response of the same sensor to high vs. normal soil temperatures differed significantly between the soils. All sensors underestimated theta(nu) in high temperature range in both soils. The ranking order of the magnitude of change in theta(nu) in response to 1 degrees C increase in soil temperature (from the lowest to the greatest impact of soil temperature on sensor performance) in silt loam soil was: SA4150, 5TE, TDR300 (S), 10HS, CS620, CS616 (H), and CS616 (V). The ranking order from lower to higher sensitivity to soil temperature changes in loamy sand was: 10HS, CS616 (H), 5TE, CS616 (V), SA4150, and TDR300 (S). When the data from all sensors and soils are pooled, the overall average of change in theta(nu) for a 1 degrees C increase in soil temperature was 0.21 m(3)/m(3) in silt loam soil and -0.052 m(3)/m(3) in loamy sand. When all TDR- and FDR-type sensors were pooled separately for both soils, the average change in theta(nu) for a 1 degrees C increase in soil temperature for the TDR- and FDR-type sensors was 0.1918 and -0.0273 m(3)/m(3), respectively, indicating that overall TDR-type sensors are more sensitive to soil temperature changes than FDR-type sensors when measuring theta(nu).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据